You think it's possible for the father to sue ch4 for making his son gay? For throwing a camera in front of that child and encouraging him/her to fall in love with themselves like Narcissus whenst he saw his own reflection in the water leading to a perpetual dance with the ego and reflecting it off people of the same sex which is one of the stronger arguments for the phenomena of homosexuality; an unwillingness to untangle oneselves from the ego and partake in the universal dance of the other.
You think he could sue successfully? Worth a try.
Don't know why Matthew deems to edit posts. I thought he wanted mature debate around here.
Heaven knows they need it.
What you think?